Te Pou - Home

o Te Whakaara Nui

Database of New Zealand mental health research

Print

Status
Completed 30 November 2009

Created
12 March 2010

Last updated
12 March 2010

Characteristics of good peer support

Investigator(s) / AuthorsPrepared for Wellink Trust by Kate McKegg and Judy Oakden

 
Principal contact
Name Ms Shelly Reet
Email shellyr@wellink.org.nz
The research
Summary Wellink Trust commissioned a small evaluation study to obtain feedback from service users and peer workers to better understand how the peer support service model works in the Key We Way context.
Objectives The overarching goal of the evaluation was to better understand the characteristics of good peer support, and more specifically to help identify the characteristics of peer support that make a difference for service users, and identify ways to do more of what works and to improve what isn't so helpful to service users.
Study design A range of data informed this review including semi structured interviews with service users and Wellink or Key We Way staff undertaken either face-to-face, by telephone or using a self completion questionnaire.
Methods Evaluation
Results Overall, the study found that the peer support approach, as implemented at Key We Way, shows great potential to affect significant and lasting change in guests.
Conclusions The approach offered guests who engage in the process the potential for significantly improved mental health and wellbeing. Some guests who had been acutely mentally unwell for long periods of time, made significant steps to recovery after engagement and interaction with peer workers at Key We Way. There were examples of past guests who were now working, involved with their community, or participating in meaningful leisure, identified by the study.
Key Descriptors Peer / Service User
Disciplines Peer/Service User Led
Settings Residential, Community, NGO (Non Government Organisation)
Diagnostic Categories General
Populations General Population
Other Keywords peer support, Key We Way, recovery
Ethics approval No
Academic led No
Service led Yes
How were service users involved Participants of the research
Publication in peer review journal No
Supporting information
Uploaded files
Links
 

Page last updated: 7 November 2008