Te Pou - Home

o Te Whakaara Nui

Database of New Zealand mental health research

Print

Status
Completed 30 November 2009

Created
12 March 2010

Last updated
12 March 2010

The Real Key We Way Story

Investigator(s) / AuthorsJanet Peters for Wellink Trust, Te Hononga Ora

 
Principal contact
Name Ms Shelly Reet
Email shellyr@Wellink.org.nz
The research
Summary This report describes a peer run service that plays a key role in supporting people who experience acute mental health problems in the Capital and Coast District Health Board region.
Objectives The aim of this report is to describe the success of Key We Way (KWW), a respite service for people who experience mental health problems.
Study design A critical method of showing service effectiveness in health is by the experiences of people who use the service. The service evaluation included a summary of views from people who have used the services. Demographic data, occupancy rates and length of stay statistics were also collected.
Methods Evaluation
Results Results showed 100% of people were very positive about the experience. The main ingredient identified as being most helpful in the process of recovery was the staff who were described as empathetic, compassionate, caring and respectful. Statistics show that on average KWW had around the same rate of occupancy as the other local recovery houses with a trend towards slightly higher rates in 2009.
Conclusions Peer services such as peer run crisis services are being seen as international best practice by many commentators. Support for KWW has been freely given by several esteemed commentators, both local and international. Three main lessons have been learnt from the point of view of the Chief Executive and Strategic Advisor and these are discussed, as well as the processes and training in place to ameliorate these.
Key Descriptors Peer / Service User, Service Development
Disciplines Peer/Service User Led
Settings Community, Residential
Diagnostic Categories General
Populations General Population
Other Keywords peer services, psychiatric distress, 24-hour support, recovery
Ethics approval No
Academic led No
Service led Yes
How were service users involved Participants of the research
Publication in peer review journal No
Supporting information
Uploaded files
Links
 

Page last updated: 7 November 2008